Compare
Build it yourself

Orbion vs In-House

Standing up protein models in-house takes infrastructure, GPUs and a multi-model pipeline — and then a dedicated team to keep every prediction trustworthy.

The Short Answer

The open weights are free, but running them in-house is not: you need an environment, GPUs for many of the models, and a pipeline to run several of them together. Then comes the real cost — a dedicated team to calibrate, surface and maintain predictions people can trust. Orbion ships that whole layer prebuilt.

You have strong scientists, maybe an ML engineer, and you're weighing whether to stand up protein prediction internally instead of buying it.

The Difference

What Actually Separates Them

Running a protein model in-house is more than a download. Most useful models need a configured environment and GPUs, and a real workflow runs several models together — so first you're building and hosting a multi-model pipeline before a single prediction is usable.

Then comes the part that costs the most. Someone has to maintain and update the pipeline as the field moves, build an interface your scientists will actually use, and — the hard, quiet part — calibrate confidence thresholds so people don't act on an unreliable prediction. Then design the workflow so a wrong number doesn't quietly become a wrong decision.

None of that is a one-off. It is a dedicated team to build it, maintain it, and keep improving it — a standing commitment that competes with the science you hired for. Buying the judgment layer keeps your scientists on the science.

At A Glance

The Model Is The Small Part

10%
18%
17%
15%
22%
18%
Model Weightsthe model
Infrastructure & GPUs
Multi-Model Pipeline
Maintenance & Updates
Confidence Calibration
Decision Guardrails
Where the effort actually goes when you run protein prediction in-house. The model weights are the small slice; everything that makes them usable and trustworthy is the rest.

Side By Side

How They Compare

 Build In-HouseOrbion
Infrastructure & GPUsYou Provision And Run ItHosted
Multi-Model PipelineYou Build And Host ItBuilt In
Time To First ResultMonths Of Platform WorkDay One
Ongoing MaintenanceYours, ForeverHandled
Confidence CalibrationYou CalibrateBuilt In
Interface For ScientistsYou Design And Support ItIncluded
New Model UpdatesYour Team Tracks The FieldRolled In
Cost ModelStanding HeadcountSubscription
In-house vs Orbion, across what actually costs you.

The Hidden Work

What You End Up Owning

A Dedicated Team

Building it, maintaining it, then improving it as the field moves is standing headcount — not a one-off project.

Infrastructure And GPUs

An environment, the GPUs many models need, and a pipeline that runs several models together and keeps running.

Calibrated Confidence

Thresholds that tell a scientist when to trust a prediction. Getting the cutoffs right is a research project in itself.

Every Wrong Call

With no low-confidence flagging, a shaky prediction looks exactly like a solid one — until it costs you a bench round.

Straight Talk

When In-House Is The Right Call

If you have a standing ML-platform team, want full control of the stack, and treat protein prediction as core IP you must own end to end, then in-house can be the right answer — and we'll tell you so. Orbion is for teams that would rather point that talent at their science.

Where Orbion Fits

The Judgment Layer, Prebuilt

  • Orbion is the judgment layer, prebuilt: model routing, calibrated confidence, low-confidence flagging, and a decision-safe interface — the months of work that come after the model runs.
  • Your sequences and results stay private and entirely yours. Inference only, EU-hosted, no training on your data, full IP ownership.

The model is the cheap part. The product is the judgment around it — model routing, calibrated confidence, low-confidence flags, and a workflow that stops a bad prediction from becoming a bad decision.

The Evidence

Backed By Bench Results, Not Just Claims

Go Deeper

Related On Orbion

FAQ

Common Questions

The model is the cheap part. Useful prediction isn't one model either — it's several open models combined with our own — and the real cost is the infrastructure, the pipeline, the confidence calibration and the decision guardrails around them, a standing commitment rather than a one-off. Worth knowing too: many public models and hosted services train on what you send them, whereas Orbion runs inference only and never trains on your data.

Stop Guessing. Start Deciding.

Run your hardest target through Orbion and see how close the predictions land to your own lab data — before you commit a single experiment.